I want to look "beyond the headlines" in this piece to use my training as a journalist and newspaper editor to clarify some misimpressions about what, traditionally, has been the purpose of journalism and media in a democracy.
I studied this in my years to achieve a bachelors of science from the University of Maryland School of Journalism, as well as time spent as a reporter in the 80s and early 90s at four daily news organizations.
This, I learned, practiced, and continue to
expect:
The most trustworthy news organizations are not meant to be a voice of the people, but an independent voice for the people.The United States had 267 fewer newspapers in 1990 than in 1940 (Colliers Encyclopedia). In 1992, only 37 U.S. cities had major, competing newspapers and the numbers have continued to grow worse since then. The loss of independent newspapers has meant a watering down of independent reporting that has given way to a rise in "viewpoint" news organizations such as Fox and MSNBC, where pretenses of presenting both sides (which I was taught in J-school) are gone.
Many of today's American news consumers seem to no longer realize they have a right to expect, demand and seek independent sourcing and information--- a sad state of affairs in a democracy!
Locally, this got under my skin when Blaine Young wrote his response a week or so ago to the Frederick News-Posts editorial, Tone it Down. He seems to think the newspaper is obligated to use its editorial columns to support his point of view.
He made that pretty clear in his reply to the newspaper's recommendation that he choose between his political career and his talk show. "Under no circumstances will I allow critics, in the media or otherwise, to silence me or run me out of office," he wrote. (His reply is here.) It was an editorial, Blaine, and the purpose of editorials is to publish opinions.
Young says he studied Mass Communications, so he should have had at least one class on History of the Media or Media and Democracy. Or you would think in high school, he might have had a basic Government class. That's where you learn the vital role an independent media plays in a democratic society.
But I don't think he paid attention. Not only does Young accuse the editorial writer of attempting to "silence him" for failing to succumb to his campaign rhetoric, but goes on to accuse the newspaper of trying to put its competition out of business by criticizing. Maybe he's really showing us the cynical way his own mind works with this line of reasoning.
In an editorial column, the newspaper has no duty to be a mouthpiece for a particular point of view.
A similar situation occurred when Joe Volz, a columnist for the Frederick Gazette, talked about this in a piece back in 2010. A letter writer had taken him to task because his column failed to reflect the letter writer's perception of the community's leanings on the subject of illegal immigration.
Volz said, pretty eloquently, that as a columnist, he is not bound to adhere his viewpoints to the perceived opinion of the community. He is absolutely right.
We all know what we expect when we turn to news reported by Fox, NPR and MSNBC. Thats why we should cherish those editorial writers, columnists, and news organizations (I, for one, love WTOP and CNN Radio) who continue to derive their information from sources on both sides of the story.
There are fewer and fewer independent, trustworthy media voices left in our community, and increasingly, in our country. I hope all the Americans who are turning back to the Founding Fathers to guide their opinions in recent years pay special attention to the Founding Fathers belief in the necessity of an independent Fourth Estate.
Part 2, coming shortly: Do we consume news, not for information, but to reinforce our own point of view?